Teak leaf (Tectona grandis) is common tropical tree
leaf in Indonesia dan the main forestry industrial organic waste problem.
Researchers have revealed active phenolic compounds of Teak leave extract and
so is its antimicrobial activity, such as tectoquinone, tannic acid, dan gallic
acid. In recent years, there has been an increasing interest in Teak leaves
crude extract application. Despite of enormous wood production, development of
Teak leaves extraction has low interest due to ineffective and inefficient
method as its high cost and low yield. MAE (Microwave-Assisted
Extraction) is novel method of extraction using microwave to effectively
and efficiently rupture cell. MAE is expected to increase the effectiveness and
efficiency of Teak leaves crude extraction process. The aim of this study was
to evaluate the effect of extraction time and solvent:material ratio (v/w) toward
Teak leaves crude extract antibacterial activity.
Block randomized
design was used to study the effect of two factors and three levels, extraction
time (0, 60, and 120 seconds) and solvent:material ratio (v/w) (2:1, 3:1, and 4:1).
Nine extractions were required to cover all possible combination. Antibacterial
activity was tested triplet using well diffusion agar assay method. Total
phenol content was examined using Folin-Ciocalteau method. Recovered yield was
observed by comparing extract phenol compound mass to 100 g fresh Teak leaves. Data
was analyzed using ANOVA (α=1%) and Honest Significance Difference test (α=1%).
The results
of this research support the idea that MAE increase antibacterial activity
against E. coli and S. aureus of Teak leaves crude extract
when tested in-vitro. Both extraction
time and distilled water volume gave quadratic responses to extract antibacterial
activity. Teak leaves crude extract using MAE possessed highest antibacterial
activity solvent:material ration at 3:1 (v/w) and 60 seconds microwaving.
Extract total phenol content of the best treatment was 359,166±15,914μg/g crude
extract. The maximum clear zone diameter against E. coli and S. aureus
were 2,100±0,100cm. S. aureus was more susceptible than E. coli towards extract.The recovered
extract yield was 0,073% (w/w).
Reference:
Reference:
Setiawan, Cynthia. 2012. Skripsi. Major Food Science and Technology. Faculty of Agriculture Technology.University of Brawijaya. Malang
0 comment:
Post a Comment